Conventional scanner
“Does this match a rule?”
- Flags detectable code patterns
- Often lacks page and content context
- Returns a list of violations
Useful for quick checks. Not designed to interpret the experience.
AI-powered accessibility assessment
See what your
scanner can’t.
InclusoIQ assesses your website against WCAG 2.2 AA in context—its content, visual presentation, semantics and interactions—to uncover accessibility barriers that rules alone can miss.
£20 one-time auditClear evidence & fixesNo subscription
Made for teams who want a more useful starting point for accessibility work.
WCAG 2.2 AAEvidence-ledBuilt for action
Beyond rule checks
Rules are useful.
Context is essential.
InclusoIQ assessment
“Could this create a barrier?”
- Interprets rendered content, semantics and visual evidence
- Explains why a finding matters to people
- Shows evidence, uncertainty and a route to fix
AI-assisted reasoning, presented with appropriate limits.
From the assessment
Not just a flag.
A defensible finding.
Your report ties each conclusion to the evidence behind it, so your team can decide what to do next with confidence.
Finding Needs review Checked
Criterion review 1.1.1 Non-text content
Logo name doesn’t match the site identity
FindingThe logo link exposes an accessible name for a different brand, plus wording that says it opens a new window when it does not.
EvidenceRendered accessibility data
Accessible name: “Aviva (Open in a new window)”Visible site identity: Abeille Assurances
Why it matters
Screen-reader and voice-input users may receive a misleading label for a primary navigation link.
Recommended next step
Update the accessible name to describe the actual destination, and remove the new-window announcement unless that behaviour occurs.
Semantic structure 1.3.1 Info and relationships
Tab-panel structure requires review
Needs reviewThe assessment found elements claiming to be tab panels without a corresponding tab interface, but reviewer conclusions differed.
↗
Rather than force a binary result, the report preserves the uncertainty and explains what should be checked.
What you receive
A report built for
decisions and delivery.
Executive view
A clear picture of material barriers, priority areas and the decisions worth making first—without making you decipher technical output.
Technical evidence
WCAG-aligned findings with relevant page evidence, reasoning, likely impact and practical remediation direction for the people fixing it.
Honest uncertainty
Where context is ambiguous or evidence conflicts, we say so. “Needs review” is a useful result—not a hidden guess.
Method & boundaries
Useful AI needs
visible limits.
InclusoIQ combines browser-rendered evidence, accessibility semantics, visual context and interaction-aware analysis. Findings are explained with the information used to reach them.
01
Evidence before assertion We show the relevant signals rather than asking you to trust a black-box score.
02
Context before certainty We treat subjective WCAG interpretation as judgement, not magic.
03
Assessment, not certification An audit is a practical starting point—not a legal opinion, guarantee of compliance or replacement for testing with disabled people.
Simple by design
One website.
One useful answer.
A practical, evidence-led WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility assessment for the page or site you want to understand better.
£20
one-time audit
- WCAG 2.2 AA contextual assessment
- Executive and technical report layers
- Evidence and remediation direction
- No subscription or recurring charge
Questions, answered
Before you begin.
Is this a guarantee that my website is compliant?+
No. Accessibility depends on content, design, code and real-world use. InclusoIQ provides an AI-assisted assessment and practical evidence; it is not legal advice, certification or a substitute for testing with disabled people.
What makes this different from a free scanner?+
Scanners are valuable for rule-based checks. InclusoIQ focuses on the contextual questions: whether names match what people see, whether semantics make sense together, and why an issue may affect a user—while showing the evidence behind the conclusion.
Why does a report sometimes say “Needs review”?+
Some WCAG questions require subjective interpretation or may produce conflicting signals. We make that uncertainty visible so a person can make an informed decision rather than receive a false sense of certainty.
What happens after I submit a URL?+
For this MVP, the audit request flow is being set up. The button currently records your interest; payment and delivery automation will be added separately.
Start with clarity
Your next accessibility
decision can be better informed.
Start a £20, one-time WCAG 2.2 AA assessment.
Get my audit Secure checkout is provided by Stripe.